This article was also published on the Huffington Post website.
Three months short of his 22nd birthday, with six unspectacular loan spells under his belt and only 75 seconds of Premier League football, Jake Livermore looked every inch the failed academy graduate destined for lesser things, albeit one that had hung on a year or two longer than most.
His inclusion in the squad for Tottenham's first game of the 2011-12 season was a surprise, and the central midfield partnership he formed with Niko Kranjcar at Old Trafford looked the like the most short term of solutions.
With Sandro injured, Luka Modric trying to push through a move to Chelsea and Tom Huddlestone and Jermaine Jenas lacking fitness, the makeshift replacements lined up against champions Manchester United and, for an hour, matched them.
Eventually United found another gear and went on to a flattering 3-0 win, but Livermore had enhanced an almost non-existent reputation.
Scott Parker arrived a fortnight later and Modric was forced to stay, but Livermore’s job wasn’t over. Jenas’s was. He was sent to Aston Villa on loan for the season.
Jenas’s most notable attribute is his anonymity. He has blended into the White Hart Lane terrain many times, disappearing in front of 36,000 witnesses.
Jenas has a discernible impact on a football match as often as Lionel Messi doesn’t.
He is a cog. A part that taken in isolation you wonder what its function is.
He doesn’t have the range of passing of Huddlestone, or the ability to lead and inspire like Parker. He can’t unlock defences with a swivel and a touch like Modric and he doesn’t make the goal-stopping interceptions Sandro does.
What he does is run around a lot and keep the game moving. His short passing is excellent, his stamina never even comes close to running low and when he finds himself in possession he generally retains it. Relieved of the burden of being the team’s primary creative or defensive midfielder he is liberated and at his most useful. In 2010-11 he was at his best when he had Modric and Huddlestone or Sandro in the team with him. The former linked with Rafael van der Vaart and the strikers, the latter broke up opposition play and Jenas filled in in the spaces between.
Football fans are known for fickleness, but the opposite is too often the case. So steadfast are some supporters in their dislike of certain players, they won’t recognise any positive contribution (outside of a match-winning goal). Jenas, like Peter Crouch, was the subject of that blind prejudice, and even if you were of a mind to appreciate his worth it was hard to find the motivation to jump to his defence.
Against Inter last year, in the return match at White Hart Lane, Jenas’s introduction after the break gave the team an energy boost and increased stability in the middle of the pitch. He was a key component in outplaying the European champions and turning them over 3-1.
That isn’t enough, and paying the fifth best central midfielder in the squad £45,000 a week doesn’t make economical sense for a prudently run football club. Villa are playing at a different level and first team chances are easier to come by there, but an injury after less than two hours of football put him out for the season, costing them over £2 million.
Back in north London, Livermore has featured in 31 of Tottenham’s 41 games this season, a stat loaded by the manager’s blasé attitude to the Europa League. Even still, the five starts and 20 appearances on the bench in the Premier League are more than anyone expected from him and are testament to the faith the manager has shown in him.
He had another good game against Manchester United the Sunday before last and went down to another unfortunate defeat.
He’s the same height as Jenas (within half an inch), the same build and a similar skin tone. He does the same unremarkable things that occasionally tip the balance of a match. From the top of the north stand or on a particularly low resolution internet stream you might not even notice Jenas has been replaced. Add a goal here and there and the transition will be complete.
At the beginning of March headlines read ‘Redknapp backs Livermore for England’, but the truth is on being asked by a journalist if the midfielder was capable of playing international football the Spurs manager replied that ‘he could be’. It’s an aspiration rather than an expectation. If Redknapp gets the England job for the European Championship he’s unlikely to take Livermore to Poland and Ukraine ahead of Parker, Michael Carrick, Tom Cleverly, Jack Wilshere, James Milner, Jack Rodwell, Frank Lampard, Steven Gerrard or Gareth Barry. Even Tom Huddlestone would be preferred if he managed to get back to fitness by June.
Jenas scored the first goal of Fabio Capello’s reign, but he’s only got four caps in the last four and a half years. Something to put on the mantlepiece rather than a significant international career. Livermore would do well to match that.
Livermore signed a new contract in December and will be at White Hart Lane next season. He will remain a decent squad player, but if Spurs stay in the top four (or even the top six) it’s almost certain he won’t be there for the full four years. He’ll want to play every week and that will be at a club in the lower two thirds of the top flight.
By then Tom Carroll will be of age. The hope is that he will be the next Modric. If he doesn’t turn out to be quite that good, at the very least, he’ll be the new Livermore, AKA the new Jenas.
Spurs News 24/7
No, I don't get this, I've tried to - you're saying 'Jenas really isn't that bad' and Livermore is 'almost quite as good as him in some ways'. I think I'd disagree for three reasons: 1. Jenas is an assassin, I don't think I've seen a worse player in a Spurs shirt - sure there have been technically worse, far too many since Burkinshaw went but it is Jenas's pretend involvement that has made him such a hated figure, he will/would never ever take responsibility, always, always pass it back and keep the guy who gave you the ball under pressure, never initiate, never start anything.
ReplyDelete2. Livermore isn't that, whatever he is, he isn't that.
3. What is Livermore? He's someone trying to be Parker but without the vision. He's far more genuinely willing than Jenas but he doesn't have the vision, and that's what will keep him a squad player and then a transfer. Jamie O'Hara was better.
4. I know I said three, but I would have written this post more about Bentley than Jenas. Bentley was an integral part of the run in to Champions League football two seasons ago, he came on and was reliable, he was someone who took responsibility and does have vision, he's not quick enough and that's what makes him less than an asset, but he was far more honest, far more of a contributor than Jenas.
i AGREE WITH mIKESHEFFLIV about Jenas.
ReplyDeleteHowever, I rate Livermore higher as he is a fighter and reasonable tackler. He also tries to make decent forward passes and also runs into attacking positions on occasion.
I'm not sure whether he'll be become a regular but I think he may possibly replace Parker in time, assuming that Sandro moves on - he is stronger than parker and does have more attacking ideas.
have to disagree with Mike, not cos i want to, but its obvious, Parker has no vision at all, nil, hes has other things, but not vision, or any of its related attributes. Thats why teams press us in the midfield because they know that. If he had that, West Ham wouldnt be where they r. Whereas livermore is a markedly different player to both Parker and Jenas, he can play one touch football, control the ball immediately and set-up two good chances with first time passes, the one against Liverpool away when Bale was one-on-one and against Man City when Bale almost got Defoe thru in the last minutes, although he can go largely anonymous without the ball, like Jenas hence the comparison, but with the ball a far more decisive asset. Also him and Caulker seem to have a steely self focus about them that was lost on Jenas.
ReplyDeleteanonymous, well said.
ReplyDeleteFacts are facts.
ReplyDeleteFirst thing Harry did at Spurs was work to replace our CM pair of Jenas/Zokora. Within a season they were replaced by Modric/Hudd/Palacios. That season Spurs has their best ever in hte Premier League.
Replacing Jenas/Zokora meant Spurs were no longer a soft touch doughnut team with a hole in the middle. Livermore looks a prospect and a better player than Jenas already.
I will be very happy to see Jake and Parker pairing again in the middle against Swansea allowing Mod/Ade/Bale/VDV the freedom to destroy. I expect most Spurs fans will be as it has worked well recently.
Hi Jack
ReplyDeleteLoved reading your articles. We would love it if you would also post your articles to www.fanalistas.co.uk, a new site for fan journalists/bloggers like you. We can automatically import your articles to your fanalistas profile and then link back to your blog giving your work exposure to our growing online community. I have no doubt that your Tottenham coverage would attract a lot of readers with us.
You can create an account here: http://fanalistas.co.uk/user/register.
If you’re interested in the automatic import option or have any other questions please email me at james.fanalistas@gmail.com
I look forward hearing from you. Keep up the great work!
James
Like us on facebook to enter our draw for an iPad 3 www.facebook.com/fanalistas
Follow us on twitter @fanalistas
I dislike the way Modric has been playing with club's policies. Last year it was Chelsea and now he's forcing a move to Madrid. Why don't Levy let him go and destroy his career. He's just a selfish lad in my opinion and the club is also very lazy in terms of his departure.
ReplyDelete